⇦ go back
Audio | Audio | Audio | Audio | Audio | Audio |
44 kHz, 16 bit, Stereo | 44 kHz, 16 bit, Mono | 44 kHz, 8 bit, Mono | 22 kHz, 16 bit, Mono | 22 kHz, 8 bit, Mono | 11 kHz, 8 bit, Mono |
Size: 2,444 kB | Size: 1,228 kB | Size: 617 kB | Size: 617 kB | Size: 311 kB | Size: 153 kB |
These are arranged in degrading quality. The first one (44kHz, 16 bit, stereo) is the original and
highest quality. The reason why the stereo sounds slighly better/fuller than the next mono file is because you can
compare the two seperate audio channels; they are slightly different in appearance on the sine graph. They
are not duplicate clones.
A sine wave is generated from an analog signal, and must be converted to digital numbers so computers
can use them. A sine wave is a continuous curve with infinitesimal points, and must be converted to a discrete number
of points. The sampling rate is basically the x-axis resolution, and the bit depth is the resolution of the y-axis.
Even our lowest quality 11 kHz, 8 bit would look pretty smooth I imagine on a graph with all those
points (11,000 samples per second on the x-axis and 8 bits would give you 256 values on the y-axis). Yet most 8-bit
files sound terrible with lots of static & noise.
Two of the files are identical file size, yet one sounds much better. It's
44 kHz, 8 bit, Mono compared to
22 kHz, 16 bit, Mono. If I look at the appearance of the sine waves in Adobe Audition, they look roughly
similar, but the 8 bit file looks slightly blockier (more rounding) on the y-axis. The reason for this is 8 bits
can only represent 256 values, and 16 bits has 65,536 different combinations of values.
This tells me it's more important to choose a higher bit depth over a higher sampling rate.
Audio | Audio | Audio |
44 kHz, 16 bit, Stereo, wav | 44 kHz, 16 bit, Stereo, 128 mp3 | 44 kHz, 16 bit, Stereo, 96 mp3 |
Size: 2,444 kB | Size: 229 kB | Size: 173 kB |
Here is the original, uncompressed .wav file. I saved it as .mp3 files in 128 kbps and 96. I cannot tell the difference in between the .wav and 128 kbps mp3 file. But I can notice a slightly lower quality in the 96 kbps mp3 file. I'm using decent audio gear ($110 Audio Technica ATH-AD700 headphones and a $100 soundblaster Z sound card).
Audio | Audio |
48 kHz, 16 bit, Stereo, aif | 48 kHz, 16 bit, Stereo, 128 mp3 |
Size: 3,168 kB | Size:342 kB |
Here I use Audition to remove background noise, and convert a lossless format to a compressed mp3 file.